• iLearnParsha
    • BaMidbar – Numbers
    • Devarim – Deuteronomy
  • iLearnHolidays
  • About
  • Contact Us

iLearnTorah

~ Torah Learning for You

iLearnTorah

Tag Archives: tshuva

Yom Kippur: In Mathematics We Find Forgiveness

02 Thursday Oct 2014

Posted by ndanzig in Holidays

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Jewish Holidays, Maimonides, tshuva, yom kippur

There are no guilty men in prison. So it is said. No person considers himself to be a bad person. He thinks, ‘Even if I did something wrong once, I am still basically a good person.  And when you look at all the circumstances, you will see that I had no choice, so I am not to blame.’  This feeling is, fundamentally, essential for self-preservation. No one can last long thinking he is a downright evil guy. But a person’s healthy positive self-image should not blind him to his own wrong doings. But it does tend to, so it is necessary to investigate deeply and find one’s wrong doings.

But this investigation is only useful if it helps you to change. If you won’t change anyway, then better not to bother.  And so, in Maimonides’ description of repentance along with recounting one’s sins goes the resolve to change, tshuva. In fact, there are 4 elements, remorse for the past errors, restitution where needed, commitment not to repeat them in the future, and the verbalization of all them. In other words, you must list, out loud, all your past wrong doings and you must state your commitment not to do the anymore. Verbalizing your commitment makes it more real and more binding. And by repeating this often, you reinforce your commitment.  So like an AA member, a Jew should recommit himself to his new path, yearly, monthly, even daily. He should go over his past sins, remind himself of the harm he caused, remorse and resolve again never to repeat them.  This is called Cheshbon HaNefesh, literally, the mathematics of the soul, or to give a more useful translation, an accounting of the soul.

People often think of big sins and small sins.  I may do some things wrong, but the big stuff, the Ten Commandments, that stuff I do keep.  This is another way of feeling good about yourself.  You turn all your sins into trivial matters but the elusive, illusionary big stuff you keep.  What that big stuff really is, your are not sure.  But you keep it, or at least you think you keep it.  Maimonides provides a method for determining what the Torah considers to be something big or something little (or in between), and he describes how each is forgiven.  And so we reach some more soul math:

  1. If a person violates a positive command which is not punishable by premature death, he is forgiven at the moment he repents.
  2. If a person violates a prohibition which is not punishable by death, he is forgiven on the Yom Kippur following his repentance.
  3. If a person violates a law which is punishable by death, he must repent, live through a Yom Kippur, and endure suffering in this world to be forgiven.
  4. If a person sinned and desecrated Gods name in so doing, he must do the above, but he is not forgiven until he dies.

Always in this list, there must be repentance, whether big sin or little.  And so nothing can be left out of the Cheshbon HaNefesh, nothing can be trivialized.  But why exactly is Yom Kippur pushed into the equation? What does Yom Kippur do for us?  Is it just an arbitrary time frame to see if the person does not go back to his wrong ways? Perhaps.  Or maybe it just an appendix left over from a time when it was really used.

Let’s ask, ‘Can a person ever be forgiven without repenting?’  Yes …kind of.  The scapegoat, sent to the desert on Yom Kippur would atone for case 2 above without the person having to repent.  But that is because the High Priest in the Temple repented the sins of all the Jews before he took the goat out to the desert.  So the individual didn’t need to repent, but there did need to be a kind of surrogate repentance. Today without a Temple, the Jew must verbally repent his sins to be forgiven, and by doing this on Yom Kippur he gains atonement for case 2 and possible case 3 sins (what Jew hasn’t suffered a little?)  Let’s not think about case 4. In the past, Yom Kippur served an essential role for atonement.  Today, without a high priest, we must take a more active role in our own gaining forgiveness. As the mussaf prayer recounts the procedures the High Priest followed, we should put ourselves in his shoes, or rather, his bare feet.

It is worth noting that the High Priest could not possible have listed every particular sin each Jew committed.  He must have only listed general categories of sins, and this too worked.  This is the source for the current practice in the Yom Kippur prayer of confessing the acrostic list of categories of sin, Al Chet.  Like the High Priest, we can minimally fulfill our obligation to recount our particular sins by stating all their categories.

Math has its beginnings in counting. What role does counting, enumerating, recounting our sins have?  I once showed my resume to a friend.  He pointed out that I need to give numbers to things.  How many people did I mange, how many servers did I administer. Giving numbers gives a clearer idea of what is going on.  People might think they did nothing wrong, or worse they might think they did innumerable things wrong.  By counting our deeds, and putting a number on them, it brings us down to Earth. We see that the wrong things are not innumerable.  And suddenly we can fix them.  When we have a vague feeling of some things out there that we did, we can’t assess them and they start to seem larger than they are.  Counting makes our mission doable.

Repentance: The 614th Commandment

21 Sunday Sep 2014

Posted by ndanzig in Holidays

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Maimonides, Mishne Torah, Rambam, repentance, Rosh HaShana, tshuva

It always bothers me when I read the first sentence of the Laws of Repentance from Maimonides’ Mishne Torah. He writes there the following (my translation):

Regarding all the mitzvoth of the Torah, whether positive or negative, if someone violates any one of them, whether intentionally or accidentally, when he repents and ceases sinning, he must confess his sins before God … this confessing is a positive commandment.

What is strange about his description is that we would expect Maimonides to write that repenting itself is a mitzvah. But by writing “when he repents” Maimonides seems to be saying that if a person should happen to repent then he gets to do the mitzvah of confession. So is a person required to repent in the first place?

Maimonides uses the word “when” not “if” so that seems to imply a person is expected, even required to repent from his sins. Still this is a pretty vague way of commanding people to repent. And when it comes to counting mitzvoth, Maimonides only considers the act of confession to be a mitzvah, not the actual repentance. He titles this section of his book, Laws of Repentance, but does not consider repentance to be a law!

So if there is no commandment to repent but there is nevertheless a requirement to repent, what is the source of this requirement? Usually when a person has a job, his employer has certain expectation of his employee that may be communicated orally or in writing. For example, Come on time, Don’t use social media on work time, Work on your assignments. If the employee comes late or does not do his assignments, the employer should not have to tell the worker to to stop coming late or stop neglecting his work. The expectation to cease breaking the rules is subsumed within each
work rule. The employer does not say, And if you break any of these rules, stop breaking them! That is the meaning of the rules themselves.

Similarly each Torah laws contains within it the obligation to stop violating it, that is what a law is. If the Torah says eat kosher food, then the Torah is saying to stop eating that cheese burger. So the concept of repentance, tshuva , is concomitant to any law system and there cannot be a separate law prohibiting the violation the law. So too, there cannot be a mitzvah that we must keep the Torah. It is a logical redundancy.

That is the reason Maimonides does not count tshuva as a commandment but nevertheless assumes there is a requirement to do tshuva. The only mitzvah left to actually count is the act of confession. Maimonides considers this act to be crucial. Without expressing one’s commitment in words, a person will begin to view his commitment as ephemeral and will begin to create excuses for his laxity. Tshuva itself is part of every law of the Torah.

Recent Posts

  • Parshat Haye Sara – Eliezer’s Test
  • Parshat VaYeshev – The Three Loves
  • The Reassertion of Female Power: The Megillah According to the Malbim
  • Exodus 35 Vayakhel : New aspects of Shabbat
  • Baal Worship: Fertility Gods and Leviticus 26

Recent Comments

Archives

  • April 2024
  • December 2023
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • August 2015
  • June 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014

Categories

  • Holidays
  • Parsha
  • Parsha for Kids
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Create account
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Classrooms

  • iLearnParsha
    • BaMidbar – Numbers
    • Devarim – Deuteronomy
  • iLearnHolidays
  • About
  • Contact Us

Categories

  • Holidays
  • Parsha
  • Parsha for Kids
  • Uncategorized

Comments

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • iLearnTorah
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • iLearnTorah
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar